<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Climate Scam &#187; Climate Scam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climatescam.org/category/climate-scam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climatescam.org</link>
	<description>Review of the Climate Change News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 13:04:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Climate Change Radicals Embrace Animism</title>
		<link>http://climatescam.org/2011/04/13/climate-change-radicals-embrace-animism/</link>
		<comments>http://climatescam.org/2011/04/13/climate-change-radicals-embrace-animism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 05:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Scam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatescam.org/?p=1482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bolivia, under climate radical influence, is proposing that a non-human entity be given human rights: Bolivia is drawing up a draft UN treaty which would give Mother Earth the same rights as humans, including the right to life, to pure water and clean air. The South American country wants the UN to recognize the Earth [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bolivia, under climate radical influence, is proposing that a non-human entity be given human rights:</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px; ">Bolivia is drawing up a draft UN treaty which would give Mother Earth the same rights as humans, including the right to life, to pure water and clean air. The South American country wants the UN to recognize the Earth as a living entity that humans have sought to &#39;dominate and exploit&#39;.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px; ">It aims to establish 11 new rights for nature which include: the right to life and to exist; the right to continue vital cycles and processes free from human alteration; the right to pure water and clean air; the right to balance; the right not to be polluted; and the right to not have cellular structure modified or genetically altered.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px; ">Bolivia&#39;s large indigenous population is ruled by Latin America&#39;s first indigenous president Evo Morales, who was elected in 2006.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px; "><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1376244/South-American-countrys-treaty-giving-Mother-Earth-rights-citizens.html">more</a></p>
<p>Ridiculous? &nbsp;Utter madness? &nbsp;In prescribing to non-human entities those qualities that are uniquely human the country is embracing animism and, in doing so, equates people to the least common denominator. &nbsp;If this measure is ratified, it will inevitably destroy human rights and drag the society into a primitive state.&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://climatescam.org/2011/04/13/climate-change-radicals-embrace-animism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This will draw some fire from the left</title>
		<link>http://climatescam.org/2011/04/11/this-will-draw-some-fire-from-the-left/</link>
		<comments>http://climatescam.org/2011/04/11/this-will-draw-some-fire-from-the-left/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 03:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Scam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatescam.org/?p=1479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Evans writes blistering commentary for the Financial Post: The debate about global warming has reached ridiculous proportions and is full of micro-thin half-truths and misunderstandings. I am a scientist who was on the carbon gravy train, understands the evidence, was once an alarmist, but am now a skeptic. Watching this issue unfold has been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Evans writes blistering commentary for the <a href="http://opinion.financialpost.com/2011/04/07/climate-models-go-cold/">Financial Post</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><em>The debate about global warming has reached ridiculous proportions and is full of micro-thin half-truths and misunderstandings. I am a scientist who was on the carbon gravy train, understands the evidence, was once an alarmist, but am now a skeptic. Watching this issue unfold has been amusing but, lately, worrying. This issue is tearing society apart, making fools out of our politicians</em></p>
<p><em>(&#8230;)</em></p>
<p><em>We are now at an extraordinary juncture. Official climate science, which is funded and directed entirely by government, promotes a theory that is based on a guess about moist air that is now a known falsehood. Governments gleefully accept their advice, because the only ways to curb emissions are to impose taxes and extend government control over all energy use. And to curb emissions on a world scale might even lead to world government &mdash; how exciting for the political class!</em></p>
<p><em>Even if we stopped emitting all carbon dioxide tomorrow, completely shut up shop and went back to the Stone Age, according to the official government climate models it would be cooler in 2050 by about 0.015 degrees. But their models exaggerate 10-fold &mdash; in fact our sacrifices would make the planet in 2050 a mere 0.0015 degrees cooler!</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Read the entire column <a href="http://opinion.financialpost.com/2011/04/07/climate-models-go-cold/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://climatescam.org/2011/04/11/this-will-draw-some-fire-from-the-left/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate Change Double Speak for Global Warming</title>
		<link>http://climatescam.org/2011/03/03/climate-double-speak/</link>
		<comments>http://climatescam.org/2011/03/03/climate-double-speak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 06:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatescam.org/?p=1474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When all else fails, activists will market their their agenda by obscuring it with innocuous, ambiguous and seemingly palatable wording. &#160;For example: Republicans are far more skeptical of &#8220;global warming&#8221; than of &#8220;climate change.&#8221; In an experiment conducted as part of a large survey, the researchers found 44 percent of Republicans endorsed the notion that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When all else fails, activists will market their their agenda by obscuring it with innocuous, ambiguous and seemingly palatable wording. &nbsp;<a href="http://www.miller-mccune.com/science-environment/global-warming-skeptics-believe-in-climate-change-28772/">For example</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Republicans are far more skeptical of &ldquo;global warming&rdquo; than of &ldquo;climate change.&rdquo; In an experiment conducted as part of a large survey, the researchers found 44 percent of Republicans endorsed the notion that &ldquo;global warming&rdquo; is real, but 60.2 percent said the same of &ldquo;climate change.&rdquo;</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://climatescam.org/2011/03/03/climate-double-speak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Next time someone says no carbon tax, remember this &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://climatescam.org/2011/02/27/next-time-someone-says-no-carbon-tax-remember-this/</link>
		<comments>http://climatescam.org/2011/02/27/next-time-someone-says-no-carbon-tax-remember-this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 03:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Scam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatescam.org/?p=1470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coming to you from Australia: &#160; In the leadup to the 2010 election, Prime Minister Gillard promised the Australian people that she would never introduce a carbon tax. On 23 February 2011 she broke this promise. In a deal with the Australian Greens, Prime Minister Gillard announced a multi-million dollar tax on carbon, with no [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center; "><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/jncV6gRtIvw" title="YouTube video player" width="480"></iframe></p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', Verdana, sans-serif; line-height: 19px; font-size: small; "><a href="http://www.stopgillardscarbontax.com/">Coming to you from Australia</a>: &nbsp;</span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', Verdana, sans-serif; line-height: 19px; font-size: small; ">In the leadup to the 2010 election, Prime Minister Gillard promised the Australian people that she would never introduce a carbon tax. On 23 February 2011 she broke this promise. In a deal with the Australian Greens, Prime Minister Gillard announced a multi-million dollar tax on carbon, with no offset in other taxes.</span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px; ">&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; text-align: left; margin-left: 40px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', Verdana, sans-serif; line-height: 19px; font-size: small; ">This is a tax that will hurt every single Australian: electricity bills alone for the average family will go up by over $300 a year. But the real cost will be far greater than just electricity prices. The price of everyday day items will increase as the costs on doing business &ndash; transport, production and so on &ndash; will rise.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; text-align: left; margin-left: 40px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', Verdana, sans-serif; line-height: 19px; font-size: small; ">This is simply another grab for cash by a wasteful government that will do nothing to address climate change.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; text-align: left; margin-left: 40px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', Verdana, sans-serif; line-height: 19px; font-size: small; "><strong>SIGN OUR PETITION AND HELP SEND CANBERRA A STRONG MESSAGE: AUSTRALIA CAN NOT AFFORD THIS TAX!&nbsp;</strong></span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; text-align: left; margin-left: 40px; ">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; text-align: left; ">&nbsp;</p>
<h1 class="ss-form-title" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 1em; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-size: 1.3em; margin-left: 40px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); line-height: normal; ">Stop Gillard&#39;s Carbon Tax</span></h1>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 1em; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; margin-left: 40px; ">&nbsp;</p>
<div class="ss-form-desc ss-no-ignore-whitespace" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font: inherit; width: 656px; white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word; margin-left: 40px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); line-height: normal; ">To all Members of the House of Representatives and Senators of the Federal Parliament of Australia, We, the undersigned, write to urge you to vote AGAINST Julia Gillard&rsquo;s carbon tax. If enacted, this tax will seriously hurt every Australian. Electricity prices will skyrocket, the price of everyday goods will increase, and job creating businesses will be punished with yet another crippling burden. As a result, businesses will be forced to cut costs, reduce employment and increase prices. This will hurt struggling Australians twice. This proposal makes no economic sense, and will do nothing to address climate change. All it will do is make every Australian family suffer and cripple our economy. As our elected representative, we urge you to vote AGAINST this proposal. Australia can not afford this tax.</span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://climatescam.org/2011/02/27/next-time-someone-says-no-carbon-tax-remember-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lack of Snow Proof of Man made Global Warming?</title>
		<link>http://climatescam.org/2011/02/02/lack-of-snow-proof-of-man-made-global-warming/</link>
		<comments>http://climatescam.org/2011/02/02/lack-of-snow-proof-of-man-made-global-warming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humorous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatescam.org/?p=1440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this video, Democrats motivate reactionary legislation via the lack of snow, claiming they don&#39;t need a scientist to see the impact of global warming. &#160;It seems to make sense that in years in which there is less than average snow the culprit used by politicians would be man-made global warming. &#160; However, the record [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center; "><iframe allowfullscreen="" class="youtube-player" frameborder="0" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/d70iXVN5EVM?rel=0" title="YouTube video player" type="text/html" width="480"></iframe></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12px;">In this video, Democrats motivate reactionary legislation via the lack of snow, claiming they don&#39;t need a scientist to see the impact of global warming. &nbsp;It seems to make sense that in years in which there is less than average snow the culprit used by politicians would be man-made global warming. &nbsp; However, the record snow experienced by the United States this year is also cited as proof of man-made global warming. &nbsp;Be it flood, drought, hurricane, heat or cold, despite the lack of predictive validation, it&#39;s all due to man-made global warming.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12px;"><a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/201102010016">Check this out</a>:</span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.3em; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px; margin-left: 40px; "><span style="font-size:12px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(70, 70, 70); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 16px; ">An Answer for Bill February 1, 2011 : 11:43 AM</span></span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.3em; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px; margin-left: 40px; "><span style="font-size:12px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(70, 70, 70); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 16px; ">Last week on his show Bill O&#39;Reilly asked, &quot;Why has southern New York turned into the tundra?&quot; and then said he had a call into me. I appreciate the question.</span></span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.3em; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px; margin-left: 40px; "><span style="font-size:12px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(70, 70, 70); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 16px; ">As it turns out, the scientific community has been addressing this particular question for some time now and they say that increased heavy snowfalls are completely consistent with what they have been predicting as a consequence of&nbsp;<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Farticles.chicagotribune.com%2F2010-02-14%2Fnews%2Fct-oped-0214-page-20100212_1_global-warming-term-climate-change-snow" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(38, 86, 153); outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; font-weight: bold; ">man-made global warming</a>:</span></span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.3em; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px; margin-left: 40px; "><span style="font-size:12px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(70, 70, 70); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 16px; ">&quot;In fact, scientists have been warning for at least two decades that global warming could make snowstorms more severe. Snow has two simple ingredients: cold and moisture. Warmer air collects moisture like a sponge until it hits a patch of cold air. When temperatures dip below freezing, a lot of moisture creates a lot of snow.&quot;</span></span></p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px !important; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px; margin-left: 40px; "><span style="font-size:12px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(70, 70, 70); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 16px; ">&quot;A rise in global temperature can create all sorts of havoc, ranging from hotter dry spells to colder winters, along with increasingly violent storms, flooding, forest fires and loss of endangered species.&quot;</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12px;">It&#39;s always easier after the fact to find at least one article amid the sea of publications who wrote something consistent with what actually occurred. &nbsp;</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://climatescam.org/2011/02/02/lack-of-snow-proof-of-man-made-global-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Killing Penguins to Prove Global Warming?</title>
		<link>http://climatescam.org/2011/01/14/killing-penguins-to-prove-global-warming/</link>
		<comments>http://climatescam.org/2011/01/14/killing-penguins-to-prove-global-warming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 06:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming Fail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatescam.org/?p=1434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hoping to prove global warming, scientists may have instead be killing penguins: WASHINGTON (AP) &#8212; Some scientists studying penguins may be inadvertently harming them with the metal bands they use to keep track of the tuxedo-clad seabirds, a new study says. The survival rate of King penguins with metal bands on their flippers was 44 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoping to prove global warming, scientists may have<a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hFB6xR-BltYrdc6mn0rSKpfl6dSQ?docId=3202e58255614eb19bf5e929c979ba9c"> instead be killing penguins</a>:</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px; ">WASHINGTON (AP) &mdash; Some scientists studying penguins may be inadvertently harming them with the metal bands they use to keep track of the tuxedo-clad seabirds, a new study says.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px; ">The survival rate of King penguins with metal bands on their flippers was 44 percent lower than those without bands and banded birds produced far fewer chicks, according to new research published Wednesday in the journal Nature.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px; ">The theory is that the metal bands &mdash; either aluminum or stainless steel &mdash; increase drag on the penguins when they swim, making them work harder, the study&#39;s authors said. Author Yvon Le Maho of the University of Strasbourg in France, said the banded penguins looked haggard, appearing older than their actual age.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px; ">Consequently, studies that use banded penguins &mdash; including ones about the effects of global warming on the seabirds &mdash; may be inaccurate, mixing up other changes in penguin life with the effects from banding, said Le Maho and colleague Claire Saraux.<br />
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>Ok, that didn&#39;t work out so well. &nbsp;So <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/environment/2011-01-12-banded-penguins_N.htm?csp=34news">what&#39;s up with this</a>? &nbsp;After 10 years of studying the birds and now understanding that their data is tainted &#8230;</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px; "><em>The researchers made clear that they believe climate change is real, but that data from banded penguins may not be offering a good portrait of its effects. &quot;We just need to think we need a better method to study it,&quot; Saraux says.</em></p>
<p>The data doesn&#39;t fit their belief so find another method of study?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://climatescam.org/2011/01/14/killing-penguins-to-prove-global-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Did Brisbane Flood?</title>
		<link>http://climatescam.org/2011/01/12/why-did-brisbane-flood/</link>
		<comments>http://climatescam.org/2011/01/12/why-did-brisbane-flood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatescam.org/?p=1426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Climate Realists comment: &#160; As shown in&#160;WA2011NewsNo1* Queensland &#38; Australian floods show a very strong tendency to occur at a certain phase of the 19yr eclipse cycle. The delusional Australian politicians who want to blame CO2, and the warmist cult propagandists of the BBC need to be reminded of simple sums: 2011-1973 = 38 = [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object height="340" width="560"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zs3XU-5Lt3I?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="340" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zs3XU-5Lt3I?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560"></embed></object></p>
<p><a href="http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=7005">Climate Realists comment: &nbsp;<br />
	</a></p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); ">As shown in&nbsp;<a href="http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=6973" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(51, 102, 153); ">WA2011NewsNo1</a>* Queensland &amp; Australian floods show a very strong tendency to occur at a certain phase of the 19yr eclipse cycle. The delusional Australian politicians who want to blame CO2, and the warmist cult propagandists of the BBC need to be reminded of simple sums:</span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); "><br />
	2011-1973 = 38 = 2 x 19yr eclipse cycle</p>
<p>	So the floods are nothing to do with CO2!</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://climatescam.org/2011/01/12/why-did-brisbane-flood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What?  Climate Scam Scientists Botched their Predictions?</title>
		<link>http://climatescam.org/2011/01/06/what-climate-scam-scientists-botched-their-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://climatescam.org/2011/01/06/what-climate-scam-scientists-botched-their-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 01:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Scam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatescam.org/?p=1417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fear mongering does have its consequences in this age of electronic and video archiving: &#160;false prophets are easy to expose. &#160;This article does just that by listing eight of a multitude of botched predictions. &#160;For example: 1. Within a few years &#34;children just aren&#39;t going to know what snow is.&#34; Snowfall will be &#34;a very [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fear mongering does have its consequences in this age of electronic and video archiving: &nbsp;false prophets are easy to expose. &nbsp;<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/12/30/botched-environmental-forecasts/" target="_blank">This article</a> does just that by listing eight of a multitude of botched predictions. &nbsp;For example:</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px; ">1. Within a few years &quot;children just aren&#39;t going to know what snow is.&quot; Snowfall will be &quot;a very rare and exciting event.&quot; Dr. David Viner, senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia, interviewed by the UK Independent, March 20, 2000. Ten years later, in December 2009, London was hit by the heaviest snowfall seen in 20 years. And just last week, a snowstorm forced Heathrow airport to shut down, stranding thousands of Christmas travelers.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px; ">2. &quot;[By] 1995, the greenhouse effect would be desolating the heartlands of North America and Eurasia with horrific drought, causing crop failures and food riots&hellip;[By 1996] The Platte River of Nebraska would be dry, while a continent-wide black blizzard of prairie topsoil will stop traffic on interstates, strip paint from houses and shut down computers.&quot; Michael Oppenheimer, published in &quot;Dead Heat,&quot; St. Martin&#39;s Press, 1990.</p>
<p>What I found most interesting is the predictions of those who scared grade schoolers in the 70s concerning the coming ice age:</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px; ">5. &quot;By 1985, air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half.&quot; Life magazine, January 1970.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px; ">6. &quot;If present trends continue, the world will be &#8230; eleven degrees colder by the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us in an ice age.&quot; Kenneth E.F. Watt, in &quot;Earth Day,&quot; 1970.</p>
<p>Enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://climatescam.org/2011/01/06/what-climate-scam-scientists-botched-their-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now Global Warming Causes Cooling?  I don&#8217;t think so.</title>
		<link>http://climatescam.org/2010/12/22/now-global-warming-causes-cooling-i-dont-think-so/</link>
		<comments>http://climatescam.org/2010/12/22/now-global-warming-causes-cooling-i-dont-think-so/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 23:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cold Weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatescam.org/?p=1414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And neither does the public. As freezing conditions blast their way across the globe from California and England to Australia climate scam skepticism is beginning to grow. &#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And neither does the public.</p>
<p>As freezing conditions <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1340436/Why-cold-warm-Greenland-Diverted-jet-stream-letting-icy-blast-Arctic.html">blast their way across the globe</a> from California and England to Australia climate scam skepticism is beginning to grow. &nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://climatescam.org/2010/12/22/now-global-warming-causes-cooling-i-dont-think-so/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Desperation in Cancun?</title>
		<link>http://climatescam.org/2010/12/05/desperation_cancun/</link>
		<comments>http://climatescam.org/2010/12/05/desperation_cancun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 06:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Scam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatescam.org/?p=1412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is this desperation or simply a reflection of the intellectual bankruptcy of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change? Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change, invoked the ancient jaguar goddess Ixchel in her opening statement to delegates gathered in Cancun, Mexico, noting that Ixchel was not only goddess of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/post-carbon/2010/11/cancun_talks_start_with_a_call.html"> this desperation</a> or simply a reflection of the intellectual bankruptcy of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change?</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px; "><em>Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change, invoked the ancient jaguar goddess Ixchel in her opening statement to delegates gathered in Cancun, Mexico, noting that Ixchel was not only goddess of the moon, but also &quot;the goddess of reason, creativity and weaving. May she inspire you &#8212; because today, you are gathered in Cancun to weave together the elements of a solid response to climate change, using both reason and creativity as your tools.&quot;</em></p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px; ">(&#8230;)</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px; "><em>&quot;Excellencies, the goddess Ixchel would probably tell you that a tapestry is the result of the skilful interlacing of many threads,&quot; said Figueres, who hails from Costa Rica and started her greetings in Spanish before switching to English. &quot;I am convinced that 20 years from now, we will admire the policy tapestry that you have woven together and think back fondly to Cancun and the inspiration of Ixchel.&quot; </em></p>
<p>Invoking the the name of a fabricated and non-existent &quot;goddess&quot; for inspiration and even quoting what she would have said?&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://climatescam.org/2010/12/05/desperation_cancun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)

Served from: climatescam.org @ 2012-05-18 20:01:11 -->
