<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weather apparently only relevant when global warming is supported.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climatescam.org/2010/02/08/weather-apparently-only-relevant-when-global-warming-is-supported/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climatescam.org/2010/02/08/weather-apparently-only-relevant-when-global-warming-is-supported/</link>
	<description>Review of the Climate Change News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 17:46:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JRR Canada</title>
		<link>http://climatescam.org/2010/02/08/weather-apparently-only-relevant-when-global-warming-is-supported/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>JRR Canada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 19:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatescam.org/?p=1388#comment-208</guid>
		<description>So the promoters of this, great postmodern science of mann made climate change, previously known as global warming,continue to push their BS.They are brave.As the wilful guillibility of our tax funded experts, has cost us $billions and appears to be an agenda driven undermining of our sovereign states, what do we need them for?If the actions are due to stupidity,fire the bozos.If it was to serve the higher cause of enviromental salvation,or world government, its treason.If they have real evidence,documented credible scientific based evidence, then lets see it, they might be patriots yet, but its near 20 years since Kyoto and still no good proof?Small wonder it screams scam.The IPCC 4th report said,&quot;We have certainty that the planet is warming like never before and that CO2 is the cause&quot;, but their evidence consisted of &quot;trust us we are scientists&quot;.And now nobody capable of critical thinking trusts this kind of science.Claiming divine authority does not cut it, not in my world,so its 2010, put up or shut up is this years motto.Closely followed by,let the RICO charges begin.The leadership on this scam have continually insisted they are so much smarter that us dummies,who could not see &quot;the science&quot;,nor see what was different with this climate cycle, they have called us a lot of names and cost the countries plenty.I want their heads.Its a small price to pay for overbearing arrogance,lets make sure they pay for their crimes against humanity.No pensions for fraud artists will be a good start.Reward the 1st to rat out their colleges?After all scammers of this type have no integrety nor loyalty.2010 will be a very good year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the promoters of this, great postmodern science of mann made climate change, previously known as global warming,continue to push their BS.They are brave.As the wilful guillibility of our tax funded experts, has cost us $billions and appears to be an agenda driven undermining of our sovereign states, what do we need them for?If the actions are due to stupidity,fire the bozos.If it was to serve the higher cause of enviromental salvation,or world government, its treason.If they have real evidence,documented credible scientific based evidence, then lets see it, they might be patriots yet, but its near 20 years since Kyoto and still no good proof?Small wonder it screams scam.The IPCC 4th report said,&#8221;We have certainty that the planet is warming like never before and that CO2 is the cause&#8221;, but their evidence consisted of &#8220;trust us we are scientists&#8221;.And now nobody capable of critical thinking trusts this kind of science.Claiming divine authority does not cut it, not in my world,so its 2010, put up or shut up is this years motto.Closely followed by,let the RICO charges begin.The leadership on this scam have continually insisted they are so much smarter that us dummies,who could not see &#8220;the science&#8221;,nor see what was different with this climate cycle, they have called us a lot of names and cost the countries plenty.I want their heads.Its a small price to pay for overbearing arrogance,lets make sure they pay for their crimes against humanity.No pensions for fraud artists will be a good start.Reward the 1st to rat out their colleges?After all scammers of this type have no integrety nor loyalty.2010 will be a very good year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fygsmom</title>
		<link>http://climatescam.org/2010/02/08/weather-apparently-only-relevant-when-global-warming-is-supported/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>fygsmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatescam.org/?p=1388#comment-207</guid>
		<description>News Speak.  Don&#039;t think just do what the &quot;glorious leader&quot; tells you to do. 2012 cannot get here soon enough.

Yes the climate is changing--it is in constant flux just ask the dinosaurs, mamoths, and trilobites.  If you actually look at the data and really analize it honestly you will see that the heat goes up then the CO2 level rise not the other way around.  This has been the greatest waste of money in the history of man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>News Speak.  Don&#8217;t think just do what the &#8220;glorious leader&#8221; tells you to do. 2012 cannot get here soon enough.</p>
<p>Yes the climate is changing&#8211;it is in constant flux just ask the dinosaurs, mamoths, and trilobites.  If you actually look at the data and really analize it honestly you will see that the heat goes up then the CO2 level rise not the other way around.  This has been the greatest waste of money in the history of man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Rock</title>
		<link>http://climatescam.org/2010/02/08/weather-apparently-only-relevant-when-global-warming-is-supported/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Rock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatescam.org/?p=1388#comment-206</guid>
		<description>NOAA is no longer concerned with scientific based evidence.  It has become a political propaganda organization.   Unproven hypotheses should not be used to drive policy.  Man made GW and man made CC are hoaxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOAA is no longer concerned with scientific based evidence.  It has become a political propaganda organization.   Unproven hypotheses should not be used to drive policy.  Man made GW and man made CC are hoaxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis Ables</title>
		<link>http://climatescam.org/2010/02/08/weather-apparently-only-relevant-when-global-warming-is-supported/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis Ables</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatescam.org/?p=1388#comment-205</guid>
		<description>If Obama pushes cap &amp; trade, he will indeed be a one term president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Obama pushes cap &amp; trade, he will indeed be a one term president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Higley</title>
		<link>http://climatescam.org/2010/02/08/weather-apparently-only-relevant-when-global-warming-is-supported/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Higley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatescam.org/?p=1388#comment-204</guid>
		<description>Right - a government site based on NOAA. NOAA cooks the numbers more than the CRU. Their station cherry-picking among other unscientific data manipulation is legion. 

Their statement above is shopping list of their propaganda campaign. They pretend everybody is out there suffering when the only people suffering are those at NOAA who are busy destroying their personal and professional integrity.

This goes to show how desperate Obama is to push cap and trade - he already has income from it built into his new budget. He sees it as a new, large income stream - from the people to his budget, no stops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right &#8211; a government site based on NOAA. NOAA cooks the numbers more than the CRU. Their station cherry-picking among other unscientific data manipulation is legion. </p>
<p>Their statement above is shopping list of their propaganda campaign. They pretend everybody is out there suffering when the only people suffering are those at NOAA who are busy destroying their personal and professional integrity.</p>
<p>This goes to show how desperate Obama is to push cap and trade &#8211; he already has income from it built into his new budget. He sees it as a new, large income stream &#8211; from the people to his budget, no stops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh K</title>
		<link>http://climatescam.org/2010/02/08/weather-apparently-only-relevant-when-global-warming-is-supported/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatescam.org/?p=1388#comment-203</guid>
		<description>If Americans are witnessing the impacts in their own backyards, why do we need yet another government bureacracy to inform us about what we have already witnessed?  Isn&#039;t witnessing the event for ourselves the most &quot;relevant and timely information&quot; possible?

To wit, DC area residents must have quickly concluded this past weekend that holding out for a snowstorm delayed press release from the NOAA Climate Service DC office would have been neither as relevant or timeely as simply looking through the kitchen window at the snow drifting through their own backyard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Americans are witnessing the impacts in their own backyards, why do we need yet another government bureacracy to inform us about what we have already witnessed?  Isn&#8217;t witnessing the event for ourselves the most &#8220;relevant and timely information&#8221; possible?</p>
<p>To wit, DC area residents must have quickly concluded this past weekend that holding out for a snowstorm delayed press release from the NOAA Climate Service DC office would have been neither as relevant or timeely as simply looking through the kitchen window at the snow drifting through their own backyard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Weather apparently only relevant when global warming is supported. Â« Climate Scam -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://climatescam.org/2010/02/08/weather-apparently-only-relevant-when-global-warming-is-supported/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Weather apparently only relevant when global warming is supported. Â« Climate Scam -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climatescam.org/?p=1388#comment-202</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Sue Eisen, RosieR., Scotty, Serendipity, Climate scam and others. Climate scam said: Weather apparently only relevant when global warming is supported. http://bit.ly/bmnKp6 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Sue Eisen, RosieR., Scotty, Serendipity, Climate scam and others. Climate scam said: Weather apparently only relevant when global warming is supported. <a href="http://bit.ly/bmnKp6" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bmnKp6</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)

Served from: climatescam.org @ 2010-09-08 04:00:11 -->